Cases 1 - 10 of 17
HALL v. ARNDT et al
as 3:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
JESSE WAYNE HALL
Defendant:
ANDY ARNDT, TRAVIS GOFFINET, KELLY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2026cv00117
Plaintiff:
NICOLAS RAMOS
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELL, KELLY ALLEN and GREG SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
JESSE WAYNE HALL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VIRGINIA SAMPSON, NATHAN HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. ALLEN
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
CATHY ALLEN, GREG SANDERS, SAMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANTON v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH C.J. BLANTON
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DAN MITCHELL, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOCKBEE v. DUGAN et al
as 2:2020cv00536
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOHN DOE, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ANTHONY MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03433
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Greg Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Hale
as 2:2018cv01749
Defendant:
Dan Smith, Omar, Mike Hale and others
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Hale
as 1:2018cv08113
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Dan Smith, Omar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
