Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99040
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40175
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12757
Plaintiff:
DONNA ELIZABETH LOWE and GREGORY LOWE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sallah v. Tanney et al
as 9:2016cv80399
Plaintiff:
James D. Sallah
Defendant:
Ligia Tanney, Erich Henley, Gregory Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Slater Zorn, LLC v. Lowe Key Media, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00342
Plaintiff:
Slater Zorn, LLC
Defendant:
Lowe Key Media, LLC and Gregory Lowe, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Lowe et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Angela Lowe and Gregory Lowe
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Covidien plc , Covidien International Finance, SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Lowe v. William Terry
as 11-10118
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY LOWE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM TERRY, Warden
Shabazz v. Pataki
as 10-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael A.Z. Shabazz, AKA Michael Hurley
Defendant - Appellee:
George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Anthony J. Annuci, Deputy Commissioner and counsel and others
Lowe v. Terry
as 5:2010cv00004
Petitioner:
Gregory Lowe
Respondent:
William M. Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
