Cases 51 - 60 of 3,585
Carvell v. Sterigenics, U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Carvell
Defendant:
Sterigenics, U.S., LLC, Sotera Health, LLC, GTCR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Trent v. Sterigenics, U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
David Trent
Defendant:
Sterigenics, U.S., LLC, Sotera Health, LLC, GTCR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Arnett v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L Arnett
Defendant:
Mike Griffith, Officer Doe #1, Guard Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Griffith, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
George V. Griffith, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffith-Sullivan v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv10075
Plaintiff:
Valerie Griffith-Sullivan
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
