Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01882
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
H&M Hennes & Mauritz GBC AB et al v. Wildfox Couture, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07956
Plaintiff: H&M Hennes & Mauritz GBC AB and H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Defendant: Wildfox Couture, LLC and Wildfox Couture IP Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 17-56531
Plaintiff - Appellee: MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellant: H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61835
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06100
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02644
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 17-55984
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellee: H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Hunter et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv01184
Plaintiff: Bevelyn Hunter and Daniel Hunter
Defendant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. , H&M Hennes & Mauritz, USA BV and Bacon Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spruill v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 2:2016cv00275
Plaintiff: Margaret V. Spruill
Defendant: H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02322
Defendant: Does and H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Plaintiff: Unicolors, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?