Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Dawn Hartfelder v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 19-2842
Defendant / Appellant:
TPR. GEOFFREY L. CLARK, BADGE #6258
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. JOSEPH RICK FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF NEW JERSEY POLICE, TRP. W. H. COX, BADGE #7592, SSGT. S. J. BARA, BADGE #5669 and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAWN HARTFELDER
Regan v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv01270
Defendant:
H Cox, Travis Bayler, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
John Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Renzi et al
as 1:2019cv01242
Defendant:
Todd Nelson, H Cox, Travis Bayler and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Lancaster v. Harris County, et al
as 19-20445
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TAYLOR, Deputy, JAMES H. COX, II, Deputy, JUDY WARNE, Judge, 257th District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. LANCASTER
Buck v. Hain et al
as 1:2019cv02446
Defendant:
C/O Deline, D. Romes, C/O Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Brien K Buck, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Harris County et al
as 4:2018cv01936
Plaintiff:
David L Lancaster
Defendant:
County Of Harris, Kim Ogg, Chris Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Harris County et al
as 5:2018cv00771
Plaintiff:
David L Lancaster
Defendant:
County of Harris, Kim Ogg, Chris Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Luhr Brothers, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Joshua H Cox
Defendant:
Luhr Brothers, Inc. , Midwest Construction Company and Ronnie Slinkard
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HARTFELDER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2016cv05461
Plaintiff:
DAWN HARTFELDER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH R. FUENTES, GEOFFREY L. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
