Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Knox v. Kate Brown, et al
as 17-35119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN KNOX, known individually as a Matrix System Offender
Defendant - Appellee:
KATE BROWN, for the State of Oregon, MICHAEL WU, for the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, for the Oregon Department of Justice and others
Knox v. Brown et al
as 6:2016cv01750
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Dr. H. F. Shellman and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6943
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Bussie v. US
as 16-6894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CONGRESSMAN ROBERT E. ANDREWS, HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv04785
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Baccus v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-6955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC Director, LARRY CARTLEDGE, PCI Warden, NC MERCHANT, PCI Mailroom Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03089
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
