Cases 61 - 70 of 203
Clemmons v. Caraway et al
as 5:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
J. Caraway, M. Weaver, R. Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Stateville Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv02821
Plaintiff:
Ronald M Johnson
Defendant:
Stateville Correctional Center, Lt. Skyes, Offc. Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. Caraway et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
J. Caraway, C. Williams, H. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen v. Fox et al
as 2:2016cv02574
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
R W Fox, D E Cueva, D Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv01559
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Troy H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Blasius et al
as 2:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Anthony H Williams
Defendant:
Lora Blasius and Enrique Luy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brentwood Behavioral Healthcare of Mississippi, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00328
Petitioner:
Charles H. Williams
Respondent:
Brentwood Behavioral Healthcare of Mississippi, LLC and Jim Hood
Defendant:
David W Dogan, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2016cv00519
Petitioner:
Eugene H Williams, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mark Grethen v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. GRETHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, GENE M. JOHNSON, former VDOC Director, JOHN JABE, former VDOC Deputy Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
