Cases 11 - 20 of 3,205
US v. Andre Hamilton
as 24-6310
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANDRE EMILIO HAMILTON
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Towaun Coleman
Defendant:
Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility and J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horn, Jimmie v. Hamilton, Todd et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Horne
Defendant:
Todd Hamilton, Marylne Larson, Bradley Boivin and others
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owes v. Hamilton C.I. Annex et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
John Owes
Defendant:
Hamilton C.I. Annex and Paul Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10790
Petitioner:
AUSTIN ISAAC HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Barry Lee Hamilton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
