Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DORSETT et al v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2026cv00528
Plaintiff:
RANDALL C. DORSETT
Defendant:
KEITH VINARDI, K. FISCHER, LEFFLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.R. v. Education Plus Corporation et al
as 6:2026cv01409
Defendant:
Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros, Debbi Knack and others
Plaintiff:
C.R.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
S.H. v. Education Plus Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv01412
Defendant:
Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros, Joseph Petriella and others
Plaintiff:
S.H.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BB v. Hancock County Board Of Education et al
as 5:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
BB
Defendant:
Hancock County Board Of Education, Walter Saunders, Weir High School and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Cook v. Hancock
as 3:2026cv05065
Petitioner:
Bradley Cook
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. USA
as 3:2026cv00571
Petitioner:
Montavius Hancock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hancock v. USA
as 3:2026cv00570
Petitioner:
Montavius Hancock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock and Unknown Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meding v. State of Missouri
as 1:2026cv00166
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Meding
Respondent:
State of Missouri and Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Paredes et al
as 2:2026cv04870
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Hancock
Defendant:
Miguel Paredes, Prudent Fiduciary Services LLC, Derek F Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
