Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Barr
as 20-2651
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harminder Singh
(PC) Case v. Fisher et al
as 1:2019cv01739
Defendant:
Dr. Harminder Singh Longia, Sara L Smith, Patricia Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grewal et al v. Hira et al
as 3:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasdeep Singh Grewal , Manmohan Singh Bhamra and Jasbir Singh
Defendant:
Harminder Singh Hira and JJB&H Hotels LLC
Counter_claimant:
JJB&H Hotels LLC and Harminder Singh Hira
Counter_defendant:
Manmohan Singh Bhamra , Jasdeep Singh Grewal and Jasbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Cecil Thornton vs Don Morgan, et al
as 1:2015cv01786
Plaintiff:
William Cecil Thornton
Defendant:
Don Morgan, Pal Virk, Ikwinder Kiranjitpal Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harminder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70709
Petitioner:
HARMINDER SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HALEY et al v. AMS SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05645
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HALEY , MONIQUE ALBORNOZ , REGINA AMANKULOR and others
Defendant:
AMS SERVICING, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
