Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv06515
Plaintiff: Harold Scott
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In re: Harold Scott
as 25-30529
Petitioner: In re: Harold Scott
Durham et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11529
Plaintiff: Rommel Durham, James Duvall, Cynthia Dvorak and others
Defendant: 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2025cv00158
Petitioner: Harold Scott
Respondent: Darryl Vannoy and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Duggan et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Defendant: Flavia Pitman, Kaye Brazil, Jalyn Mathis and others
Plaintiff: Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Tidwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00887
Defendant: Judge Barry Tidwell, John Zimmerman and Harold Scott Saul
Plaintiff: Donnavan M. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott
as 1:2021cv01316
Plaintiff: Harold Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Downs et al
as 6:2022cv06006
Plaintiff: Harold Scott
Defendant: Timothy Downs, Kyle Payton, Matthew Bellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Downs et al
as 1:2021cv01317
Plaintiff: Harold Scott
Defendant: Timothy Downs, Kyle Payton, Matthew Bellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Harold Baker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-14706
Defendant / Appellant: HAROLD SCOTT BAKER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?