Cases 21 - 30 of 6,397
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly Harper v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Petitioner:
Holly Harper
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
Harper v. Marinez et al
as 3:2024cv50143
Plaintiff:
Amber Harper
Defendant:
Judge Francis Marinez, Samantha Hagerman and Alesha Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
JILL E. RANGOS, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarett v. Garnett, Kansas, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reese Jarett and Reese Jarett
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Anderson County, Kansas, Les McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hill, Stephen Donald Delcuze, Julio Delgado and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Shade v. Harper Woods, City of
as 2:2024cv10976
Plaintiff:
Daevon Shade
Defendant:
Harper Woods, City of
Stanton v. Welcome et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Devon Ray Stanton
Defendant:
Dep. Cory S. Welcome, Dep. Harper and Berkeley County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
