Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Charles-Neely v. Boehner et al
as 1:2014cv08328
Plaintiff:
Todd Richard Charles Neely
Defendant:
John Boehner , Harry Reid , Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Reid et al
as 2:2014cv01561
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
B.H. Obama, Rick Perry, Harry Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jeter v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv01489
Plaintiff:
Adele T. Jeter
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Harry Reid and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SPRAGGINS v. SCOTT et al.
as 3:2014cv00478
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, JOHN BOEHNER, HARRY REID and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER CRAIG SPRAGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01353
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demos v. United States Congress et al
as 4:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States Congress, Harry Reid and Ronald Reagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos et al v. Reid et al
as 3:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr. and Anwarr Shabazz
Defendant:
Harry Reid, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. MCCAIN et al
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
JOHN MCCAIN, MITCH MCCONNELL, HARRY REID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicola Taysom v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-35021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLA JO NEWCOMB TAYSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, JOSEPH BIDEN, Vice President of the United States, US CABINET MEMBERS and others
Miller v. Obama et al
as 3:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Victor K Miller
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Harry Reid, John Boehner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
