Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Medical Protective Company v. Donald Gronbeck, et al
as 26-3646
Plaintiff:
THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
DONALD ALEXZANDER GRONBECK, YELLOW SPRINGS PRIMARY CARE, INC., ELIZABETH BREWINGTON and others
HARTLEY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACUTICAL INC.
as 1:2026cv02550
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN HARTLEY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACUTICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03734
Plaintiff:
Darla Hartley
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hartley v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv04495
Plaintiff:
Donna Hartley
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Hartley
as 26-3627
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KAYLA HARTLEY
LEE v. SCHMELZLE et al
as 3:2026cv03922
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Defendant:
M SCHMELZLE, J CARR, P BLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chandler et al
as 1:2026cv01615
Plaintiff:
Melissa Mae Smith
Defendant:
George Chandler, Michael Hartley, Darrell Jane and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Porter, et al v. Hartley
as 26-1543
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PORTER and VINCENT CHANEY
Defendant:
DENISE HARTLEY, WILLIAM SCURRY, BRIAN MARTINEAU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
