Cases 11 - 20 of 38
In re: American E-Liquid
as 19-2242
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, NORMAN E. SHARPLESS, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Appellant:
ARIZONA SMOKE FREE BUSINESS ALLIANCE, AMERICAN VAPING ASSOCIATION, OHIO VAPOR TRADE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, TRUTH INITIATIVE, LEAH BRASCH and others
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL SIEGEL, STATE OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
In re: Cigar Association
as 19-2130
Intervenor:
SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES TRADE ASSOCIATION- TEXAS, NEW YORK STATE VAPOR ASSOCIATION, CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, LINDA GOLDSTEIN, MD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Appellant:
CIGAR RIGHTS OF AMERICA, PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION, f/k/a International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers Association and In re: CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HEALTH OFFICERS and STATE OF MARYLAND
American Academy of Pediatrics v. American E-Liquid
as 19-2132
Not Yet Classified:
RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, MARYLAND VAPOR ALLIANCE, IOWANS FOR ALTERNATIVE TO SMOKING AND TOBACCO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEAH BRASCH, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK and others
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
International Masonry Training and Education Foundation et al v. Hawaii Masons' Training Fund et al
as 8:2018cv03320
Defendant:
Hawaii Masons' Training Fund, Francis Pascual, Peter Iriarte and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees and International Masonry Training and Education Foundation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv02575
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv01312
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp. , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Goyzueta-Pickett et al v. English et al
as 1:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
Maria Ximena Goyzueta-Pickett and Sharanam Hawaii, LLC.
Defendant:
Aneaka English, Taso R. Saunders, E.S. Investments Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America, et al v. Mims Management Group, LLC, et al
as 5:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
United States of America , The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mims Management Group, LLC, Institutional Pharmacy Solutions, LLC, Northeast Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
