Cases 21 - 30 of 549
Hayes v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers-Hayes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
Wanda M. Rodgers-Hayes and Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hayes et al v. Compass Group USA Inc
as 4:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Brittany Hayes and Cassandra Quain
Defendant:
Compass Group USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hayes v. Parson et al
as 2:2023cv04119
Plaintiff:
Dustin A Hayes
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Anne L. Precythe, Julie Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01671
Plaintiff:
Billy Hayes
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bright v. Pathformance, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Erik Nelson Bright
Defendant:
Pathformance, Inc., Elizabeth Johnson, Kurt Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
United States v. Christina Cardenas
as 23-1860
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christina Cardenas, also known as Christina Robin Hayes
Hayes v. Marshall Police Department
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred Hayes
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department, Nicolas Perez, Michael Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
