Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DUNCAN v. PENDERGRASS et al
as 1:2019cv00459
Defendant:
DAVIS, SHERIFF PENDERGRASS, ORANGE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkle v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
as 7:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
M.D. David John Hinkle
Defendant:
Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HINKLE v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
JANET HINKLE
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC, DEPUY PRODUCTS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BASS v. GREAT EASTERN RESORT et al
as 1:2016cv00360
Plaintiff:
KAREN F. BASS
Defendant:
GREAT EASTERN RESORT, DAVID CLEVENGER, TIM HINKLE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND et al v. FISHER et al
as 1:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and ARTHUR H. BUNTE, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD C. FISHER, MARY R. FISHER, EDGAR B. HINKLE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Hartford Fire Insurance Co., as Surety v. Hinkle Contracting Co., LLC
as 5:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Co., as Surety
Defendant:
Hinkle Contracting Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTRAL STATEES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL v. CARGO CARRIERS, INC. ET AL
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD MCDOUGALL
Defendant:
CARGO CARRIERS, INC. , DONALD C. FISHER , MARY R. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
