Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Hooker v. NaphCare Medical et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Chris L. Hooker
Defendant:
NaphCare Medical, CCDC, Janny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv01911
Defendant:
3M Company, ABB Incorporated, Crown Holdings and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mendoza, Rick Mendoza and Angelo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv01883
Defendant:
3M Company, ABB Incorporated, Crown Holdings and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Mendoza, Rick Mendoza and Angelo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hooker v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv08203
Plaintiff:
Megan Hooker
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roshawn Douglas v. City of Gardena et al
as 2:2021cv06327
Plaintiff:
Roshawn Douglas
Defendant:
City of Gardena, Steve Kim, Brian Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Winter v. M/V HAPPY HOOKER III et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Winter
Defendant:
M/V HAPPY HOOKER III (AK No. AK2191P), Yakutat Adventures, LLC and Stephen John Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Elorreaga et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 4:2021cv05696
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Elorreaga and Rosemary Elorreaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hooker v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2021cv04228
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Maurice William Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
