Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Norman Howard Ellis v. Rob Bonta et al
as 8:2022cv01995
Plaintiff:
Norman Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGill et al v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills, Florida et al
as 5:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Martha MacFarlane, Chief Herbert Thomas, David Nebel and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Alimenti, Howard Ellis and Matthew T McGill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv20860
Plaintiff:
Mary Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., American Honda Motor Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Takata Corporation et al
as 6:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Mary Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, American Honda Motor Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, David Amparan, Arundati Yedavelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis, Jr. v. City of Elmira
as 6:2014cv06666
Plaintiff:
Howard Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Elmira, Elmira Police Department and Justin B. Farwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard Ellis v. James Benedetti, et al
as 13-16767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, TONY CORDA, ROBERT HARTMAN and others
Howard Ellis v. Jack Palmer, et al
as 13-15521
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOWARD ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK PALMER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ellis v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00099
Petitioner:
Howard Ellis
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
