Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Nute v. Tyson et al
as 4:2020cv01920
Defendant:
Christopher Zito, Leah Hitchcock Braswell, Christina Corona and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Nute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SureTec Insurance Company v. Howell, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2020cv00794
Defendant:
Charles H. Pollard and Howell, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
SureTec Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Audrey L Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Calhoun County Probation Office, Steven Walker, Matthew Wades and others
Plaintiff:
Detrick Elston Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Howell et al
as 2:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
LaToni Althea Daniel
Defendant:
Coosa County Detention Facility, Coosa County Alabama, Office of the Sheriff of Coosa County Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Great American Insurance Company v. Gates Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Rhonda Dawn Gates Howell, Gates Builders, Inc. and Kenneth J. Gates
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00884
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
