Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Flannigan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2026cv01667
Plaintiff:
Donald Flannigan
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Honas v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv12233
Plaintiff:
William Honas
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, STRYKER SALES, LLC and Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kisor v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 6:2026cv00972
Plaintiff:
Lauri Kisor
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation a New Jersey corporation doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Honas v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv01636
Plaintiff:
William Honas
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, STRYKER SALES, LLC and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flannigan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
Donald Flannigan
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McAlexander v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 26-1091
Plaintiff:
DOUG MCALEXANDER
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Ezell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 26-1096
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EZELL
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Burns v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 26-1089
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BURNS
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Porter v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 26-1090
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA PORTER
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Childs v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2025cv04589
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Childs
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
