Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Haines et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv01197
Plaintiff:
Tracey M. Haines and Donald R. Haines, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04949
Plaintiff:
Catherine Haines
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneider v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2017cv01630
Plaintiff:
Marlene Schneider
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, U.S. Bank, National Association , Alton Banking & Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart v. Advanced Medical Reviews Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Garry Stewart
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Reviews Inc, Examworks Inc, J D Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Hain BluePrint, Inc. v. BluePrint Coffee, LLC
as 4:2016cv01758
Plaintiff:
Hain BluePrint, Inc.
Defendant:
BluePrint Coffee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
South v. Jack Rabbit USA LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Stephen South
Defendant:
Jack Rabbit USA LLC , Jack Rabbit Services LLC and David Hain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06059
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Hammock v. Haines et al
as 6:2015cv03091
Plaintiff:
Teddy Joe Hammock, II
Defendant:
Ben Haines, Brown, Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julie Hance, et al v. Medtronic, et al
as 14-8028
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Julie Hance, Joyce Smith, Jonatham Kent Hance and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does, 1-100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
