Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. George Haliburton
as 26-2539
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
George A. Haliburton
Arhim #170593 v. Hatfield et al
as 1:2026cv02119
Plaintiff:
George Arhim #170593
Defendant:
Unknown Hatfield, Unknown Drury, Brandon Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haliburton v. Chriss et al
as 1:2026cv00655
Plaintiff:
Thomas Haliburton
Defendant:
James Alexander Chriss, Jamie S. Miller, Frank Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Haliburton v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv10421
Plaintiff:
Stacy Haliburton
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gaines v. Haliburton Energy Services Inc et al
as 5:2025cv00661
Plaintiff:
Dickla Gaines
Defendant:
Haliburton Energy Services Inc and Cesar Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Haliburton v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2024cv01435
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Plaintiff:
Deana Haliburton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv81229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Guthrie et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04321
Plaintiff:
Michael Hallett, Estate Of Homer Hager, Charles Guthrie and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
