Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Norton v. Hallock
as 2:2017cv01742
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Norton
Defendant:
L. Hallock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slavish et al v. The City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania Housing Authority et al
as 3:2017cv01468
Plaintiff:
Catherine Slavish , Karima Ahmad , Kenneath Barnes and others
Defendant:
The City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania Housing Authority and Donna Kozak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff Department et al et al
as 1:2017cv11509
Defendant:
Phil Daigneau, Sandra Hutchens, J. Pecot e.g and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WION v. ROLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN WION
Defendant:
HUNTER K. ROLAND , AARON SANDEN , WATTSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Byrd v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03026
Plaintiff:
Justin E Byrd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Catherine Gerski, Warden No 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Manzanillo v. Gregory Lewis, et al
as 17-15049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. MANZANILLO
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY D. LEWIS, K. MCGUYER, T. A. WOOD and others
Kirk Vester v. Daniel Hallock
as 16-3389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kirk D. Vester
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Hallock, in his Official Capacity
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv07612
Plaintiff:
Joel Thomas
Defendant:
Matt Miller, J Eric Pittman, Kane County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hallock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
William Hallock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
