Cases 1 - 10 of 1,277
Goldsboro v. Ivey et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Major Torquado, Jennifer Leca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kayla Heidelberg v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HEIDELBERG, Administrator of the Estate of Cleve Heidelberg, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, LARRY BERNARD, EMANUEL MANIAS and others
Brocato v. Hamm
as 7:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Defendant:
Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Hill v. Jennifer Pell, et al
as 24-3268
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY HILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER PELL, SCOTT CRAWFORD, BRITTANY N. HAMM and others
C.J.M. v. Racine Unified School District et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
C. J. M.
Defendant:
Racine Unified School District, Benigno Velasquez, Leonard Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Hamm's Frontier Marine LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Hamm's Frontier Marine LLC, East Side River Transportation Inc and Towboats LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
