Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Wilkins v. Hann et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Hann and Clark Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brangwynne et al
as 3:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Deputy J. Hann, Deputy K. Brangwynne, Deputy A. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Reyes et al
as 1:2019cv02296
Defendant:
C.O. Zikiya Reyes, Daniel Huttel, Lt. Robert Hotaling and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Ellenberger et al
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Hann and S. Ellenberger
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv06184
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, F. Ortiz, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Vidal Joseph and Joseph Vidal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Cole
as 18-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ShaVelle Lamarr Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Lieutenant Amy Bouck, Steuben County Jail, Keith Kastner-Smith and Lorrie Gardner
Defendant:
Sheriff David V. Cole, Steuben County Jail, UnderSheriff James L. Allard, Steuben County Jail, Major Matthew P. Whitmore, Steuben County Jail and others
Jevon Everett v. Hann, et al
as 17-2673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEVON A. EVERETT
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O HANN, C/O RODGER, SGT PIERCE and others
Fabricio v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv08731
Plaintiff:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant:
W. Lee, T. Griffin, E. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
