Cases 31 - 40 of 40
HARAN v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
as 2:2011cv01865
Plaintiff:
SUBRAMANIAM E HARAN
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Christopher Hemmings v. USA, et al
as 09-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher D. Hemmings
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Adam Michael Abensohn, Sean Thomas Haran and others
HEMMINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00907
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. HEMMINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADAM MICHAEL ABENSOHN, SEAN THOMAS HARAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
4Pluris, LLC v. Haran
as 8:2008cv01257
Plaintiff:
4Pluris, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Haran
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDERSON v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
JEROME ANDERSON
Defendant:
A.K. PRUITT and SHARON HARAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Haran et al v. T&W Tire LP et al
as 5:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
Terence Michael Haran and Susan Ann Haran
Defendant:
T&W Tire LP, Jet Trucking LLC, Christy Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beard v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00077
Petitioner:
Chudney Haran Beard
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beard v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2007cv00347
Petitioner:
Chudney Haran Beard
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charney et al v. Zimbalist et al
as 1:2007cv06272
Plaintiff:
Scott Charney, Diva Goodfriend-Koven, Robert Reach and others
Defendant:
Carla Zimbalist, Pam Chanla, Jennifer S. Wilkov and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Abraham, et al v. Singh, et al
as 2:2004cv00044
Plaintiff:
Rajeswara Rao Jami, Davis Mathai Puthussery, Abraham Dowrla and others
Defendant:
Labor Consultants International, Falcon Steel Structures, Terry Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
