Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bernard Hardrick v. Terry Wilkins
as 26-1797
Petitioner:
BERNARD ANTOINE HARDRICK
Respondent:
TERRY WILKINS, Warden
Lancer Insurance Company v. South Paw Transport LLC et al
as 5:2026cv01607
Plaintiff:
Lancer Insurance Company
Defendant:
South Paw Transport LLC, John Walter McAdams, McAdams Diesel LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Simon v. School Board of Orange County, Florida et al
as 6:2026cv01355
Plaintiff:
Don Simon
Defendant:
School Board of Orange County, Florida, Dr. David Hardrick, Barbara Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hardrick v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 6:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Hardrick
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service, Victoria Police Department, Justin Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burton v. Columbia State Community College et al
as 1:2026cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Burton
Defendant:
Columbia State Community College, Ruth Holt, Katherine Willingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardrick v. Hill et al
as 2:2025cv00311
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick
Defendant:
Unknown Hill, D. Pynonnen and Michigan State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick #606507 v. Hill et al
as 2:2025cv00311
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick #606507
Defendant:
Unknown Hill, D. Pynonnen and Michigan State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick #606507 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2025cv00301
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick #606507
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
