Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA et al
as 1:2017cv07250
Defendant:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation and Thomas Babusch
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
HAROLD PRICE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Price et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24980
Plaintiff:
Patricia F. Price and Ronald Harold Price
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01216
Plaintiff:
Ernest Jones , Helena Orphey , John Orphey and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, American International Specialty Lines, Insurance Company of the State of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
