Cases 1 - 10 of 346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Reid v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Admin Est Delisa Hernandez Reid
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Nurse Delisa Jordan, Nurse Merian Kamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Titus v. Rihanna, et al
as 6:2024cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rihanna, Nikki Minaj, Eminem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Van Hawk v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Kosciusko County and Kosciusko County Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Kevin Reece v. Thomas Horner
as 24-1183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RAY REECE
Defendant:
THOMAS HORNER, MATTHEW DAVID LEACH, LEE B. BOLLINGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
