Cases 41 - 50 of 213
Floyd v. Friday, et al.
as 1:2021cv02449
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
MRDCC, Warden Cleveland Friday, Warden Nurudeen Matti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. White et al
as 7:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Carl Manis, Hearing Officer K.D. Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Leabough et al
as 1:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Tillman
Respondent:
Hearing Officer Nickelberry, Superintendent Larry Leabough and Major F. Mack, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Frame et al
as 2:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Captain Toney, Ad Seq. Committee David McKenny, Investigator John Young and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Lt. Smith, Sgt. Michael Plutro and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Mullins et al
as 7:2020cv00752
Defendant:
A. Mullins, Harold Clarke, Sgt. S. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2020cv00598
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Hearings Officer L. Mullens, Warden Jeffrey Kiser and C/O J. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Marshall et al
as 4:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Grievance Chief Mr. Anderson, D.H.O. Hearing Officer Ms. Barker, Lt. Moss and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Henry Ponton, S. Fletcher, Deborah Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henslee v. Stoppell et al
as 5:2019ct03369
Defendant:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sgt. Mansphit, Sgt. Stoppell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
