Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Rashaw-Bey v. Nalley, et al
as 11-3209
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOFFREY L. RASHAW-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
M. NALLEY, Regional Director, C. CHESTER, J. WHITE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Holloway v. Disciplinary Hearing Officers et al
as 5:2011hc02139
Petitioner:
Victor Holloway
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officers and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dials v. Disciplinary Hearing Officers et al
as 5:2011hc02114
Petitioner:
Travis Dials
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officers and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Howze v. Disciplinary Hearing Officers et al
as 5:2011hc02110
Petitioner:
Theodore Howze, III
Respondent:
Disciplinary Hearing Officers and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbert Arteaga v. Dorina Varner
as 10-4413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT ARTEAGA
Defendant - Appellee:
DORINA VARNER, Chief Hearing Officer
Jesse Bell, Jr. v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 10-40858
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE LEE BELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, RISSIE OWENS, Director, B.P.P., SHANDA MCKENZIE and others
Frazier v. Jackson, et al
as 09-1429
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH E. FRAZIER
Respondent - Appellee:
HEARING OFFICER JACKSON, WARDEN HOYT BRILL, Private prisons Monitoring Unit Designee John Doe and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
LONG v. DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER
as 1:2009cv00652
Petitioner:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Respondent:
DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witty v. Harris et al
as 1:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Jermaine Witty
Respondent:
R Harris and John B Fox
Defendant:
District Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brantley v. Rodriguez
as 08-40008
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMIE BRANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WALLY RODRIGUEZ, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Stevenson Unit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
