Cases 1 - 10 of 2,375
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Swanson et al v. Hilgers et al
as 4:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Heather Swanson and Oneida Health, LLC
Defendant:
Mike Hilgers and Charity Menefee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisen v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Nueces County, Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Menze v. County of Otter Tail et al
as 0:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Aaron O. Menze
Defendant:
County of Otter Tail, Wayne Stein and Heather Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Valenzuela (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Heather Valenzuela
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mathis v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya Lucero, Wence Asonganyi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
