Cases 1 - 10 of 138
United States of America v. Arau (Perkins)
as 23-7752
Defendant:
XAVIER ARAU, HENRY JONES, CASSIUS MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIJAH PERKINS and Eli
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Jahmai John Henry Jones
Respondent:
United States of America, Iowa Medical Classification Center, Tope-Cassie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry Jones v. Amanda Lamb
as 23-1017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA LAMB
v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv12519
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and CORNELIOUS HENRY JONES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12528
Plaintiff:
CORNELIOUS HENRY JONES, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Ferguson Unit et al
as 4:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
John Henry Jones
Defendant:
Ferguson Unit and Cellmate D-Block Ferguson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ferguson Unit
as 4:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
John Henry Jones
Defendant:
Cellmate 2017-2018, Ferguson Unit, Harris County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Iowa, State of
as 6:2022cv02015
Plaintiff:
Jahmai John Henry Jones
Defendant:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jayson White v. Betsy Jividen
as 21-7464
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYSON BRADLEY WHITE
Intervenor Plaintiff:
JEREMY SALISBURY, JAMIE HICKS, SHAUN DUKE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY C. JIVIDEN, Commissioner of WVDOCR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
