Cases 21 - 30 of 273
USA v. Daryl Hickson
as 22-13789
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARYL L. HICKSON
BEY v. BAYLSON
as 2:2022cv03917
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL HICKSON BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodricus Scott v. Jared Akins, et al
as 22-12499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODRICUS D. SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED AKINS, Statesboro Police Department, individual and official capacities, TYSHEA CHARDAE LEE, Grand Juror, FRANCES JEANETTE MONTERO, Grand Juror and others
JONES v. HICKSON et al
as 2:2022cv02541
Plaintiff:
RONALD JONES
Defendant:
MALIK HICKSON, BRAD THORNTON and THE TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Thompson v. CCA
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyle M Thompson and Kyle Matthew Thompson
Defendant:
CCA, CAFCC, A Hickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKSON v. PECO ENERGY
as 2:2022cv02053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Defendant:
PECO ENERGY, PUC, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKSON v. JONES et al
as 2:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
MALIK HICKSON
Defendant:
RONALD J JONES, SR and BRAD THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Michael Hickson v. Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 22-6253
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
HICKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01614
Plaintiff:
JUAN HICKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
