Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Johnson v. Holmes, III et al
as 2:2023cv05321
Plaintiff:
Damien Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
William Harrison Holmes, III and Duane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13966
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENRY HOLMES, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv00919
Petitioner:
Henry James Holmes, III
Respondent:
Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Owen et al
as 1:2021cv00085
Defendant:
ER Tech Rodrick, Medical Center of Bowling Green, KY, Officer Michele Owen and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Prevo et al
as 2:2021cv00550
Defendant:
Correy Bultcers, Charlie C Prevo, Paticilla P Prevo and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2020cv02155
Defendant:
Emily J. Reynolds, Judge James Cox, Sebastian County Arkansas Judge of Fort Smith and Greenwood and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hernandez v. Al's Trucking, Inc et al
as 4:2020cv02489
Defendant:
UV Logistics, LLC d/b/a United Vision Logistics i, Al's Trucking, Inc, Clarence Holmes, III and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. SGT Feeney et al
as 1:2019cv05985
Defendant:
Martia, Weigel, Kali M. Strachota and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
