Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Homan v. Clover Health Investments, Corp.
as 3:2026cv01047
Plaintiff:
Clyde Homan
Defendant:
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Homan, et al. v. County of Riverside
as 26-4232
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS HOMAN, individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDUARDO CERVANTES, RYAN GRIGGS and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Homan v. Bisignano
as 26-3048
Plaintiff:
FRANK HOMAN
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Homan v. Colonial Penn Life Insurance Company
as 26-2962
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE R. HOMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of the Class
Defendant:
COLONIAL PENN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation
Briggs et al v. Mullin et al
as 1:2026cv05238
Plaintiff:
Dana Briggs, Ian Sampson, Grace Cooper and others
Defendant:
Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
QUINLAN et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2026cv01493
Plaintiff:
HEATHER QUINLAN, JESSICA GRANGER, TERRY SHAFER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Homan v. Colonial Penn Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 26-2645
Respondent:
CAROLINE R. HOMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of the Class,
Petitioner:
COLONIAL PENN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
