Cases 91 - 100 of 220
Gill v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv05160
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gill
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, John Doe, William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv01522
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 14beautystore2014, Benwon Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Christiansen et al v. Robbins Hose Company, No. 1 of Dover, Delaware
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sean Christiansen and Elizabeth Christiansen
Defendant:
Robbins Hose Company, No. 1 of Dover, Delaware
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hose v. Henry Industries, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01913
Plaintiff:
James Hose
Defendant:
Henry Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Myers v. Hydraulic Hose of Hillsborough, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02555
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Myers
Defendant:
Hydraulic Hose of Hillsborough, LLC and Brian O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PhD Marketing, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv07660
Plaintiff:
PhD Marketing, Inc. and E-Hose Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Dongguan Betos Electronic Co., Ltd., et al.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
