Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ROMAN v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM B.C. ROMAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN RONALD PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv04031
Plaintiff:
SHAWN D TAYLOR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN RONALD PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
PAGAN v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv03835
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NATHINIEL PAGAN and JEFFERY NATHINIEL PAGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, HOWARD HOLLAND, OCIE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DISABILITY RIGHTS PENNSYLVANIA v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY and HOWARD HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard Holland v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10200
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOWARD HOLLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holland v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv02344
Petitioner:
Howard Holland
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
