Cases 11 - 20 of 1,752
EMRIT v. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN et al
as 2:2024cv04702
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Comittee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America also known as Ronald Satish Emrit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, United States Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ratliff v. The City of Huntington et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Ratliff
Defendant:
The City of Huntington, John Doe Officers, Paul Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeGross et al v. Hunter et al
as 3:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
Jennifer DeGross and Shane DeGross
Defendant:
Ross Hunter, Ruben Reeves, Natalie Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUNTER v. T-MOBILE
as 2:2024cv04128
Plaintiff:
JENEE HUNTER
Defendant:
T-MOBILE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTER v. WESTLAKE FINANCIAL
as 2:2024cv04129
Plaintiff:
JENNEE HUNTER
Defendant:
WESTLAKE FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
