Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Campbell et al v. Louisinord et al
as 1:2026cv00106
Defendant:
Rush Enterprises, Inc., Rush Truck Centers, Rush Truck Centers, Huntley and others
Plaintiff:
Carie M. Campbell and Jeffrey L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Woodward et al v. Enock et al
as 1:2026cv00105
Defendant:
Jacob Campbell, Rush Truck Centers of Texas, Inc., Rush Truck Centers, Huntley and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Woodward and Gary Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Careil v. Huntley
as 1:2026cv00561
Respondent:
Elizabeth Farrell Huntley
Petitioner:
Pascal Hubert Laurent Careil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WARD v. HUNTLEY et al
as 1:2026cv01230
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN WENDELL WARD
Defendant:
STACEY HUNTLEY, ZACHARY GUTHERIE, STEPHEN C. JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Kayveon Huntley
as 26-3087
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kayveon Huntley
Barbato v. LoanDepot.com LLC et al
as 5:2026cv05969
Plaintiff:
Bradley Barbato
Defendant:
LoanDepot.com LLC, Longbridge Financial LLC, Anthony Huntley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 2:2026cv06817
Plaintiff:
Timothy Huntley Williams
Defendant:
United States of America and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. USA
as 0:2026cv62638
Plaintiff:
Keyona Jerkura Huntley
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Huntley v. USA
as 1:2026cv26540
Plaintiff:
Keyona Jerkura Huntley
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Huntley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00724
Plaintiff:
Christopher Huntley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
