Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Guzman Escalante v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Vanessa I. Guzman Escalante
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guzman v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Juan I. Guzman
Defendant:
John A Miller and Mississippi State Bar
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loma et al v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2020cv02827
Defendant:
Michael (I) Felsoci, Adolph Chavez, Jr., Michael (I) L. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Mikel Whitney and Brian Loma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACM FV VII (Cayman) v. The Estate of Charlie La Costa-Sampedro et al
as 3:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Jane Doe, RICARDO J LA COSTA-MARTINEZ, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ACM FV VII (Cayman) Asset Company by Capital Crossing Servicing Company, as servicer and ACM FV VII (Cayman) Asset Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Brandt v. Chavez et al
as 1:2020cv00308
Defendant:
Kenneth Chavez, Sylvia Cosgake, Ashley Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Brandt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GUZMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv14442
Plaintiff:
NORMA I GUZMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Chapman v. Guzman Barrera et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
Alice J Chapman
Defendant:
USA, Jeremias Guzman Barrera and Jeremias (I) Guzman Barrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Guzman v. Robertson
as 5:2018cv05015
Petitioner:
Jonathan I. Guzman
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Theodore Eisenbach v. Mark Zatzkin
as 16-20748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE EISENBACH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK ZATZKIN and I. GUZMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
