Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARCHISOTTO v. MALIK et al
as 3:2020cv20426
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY NEW JERSEY, STUART J. RABNER, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E.M.R., L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5106
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Mark A. Morgan, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor, E.A.N., a minor and others
M.M.V. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02773
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Andrew Davidson, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
MMV, L.P.E., I.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Mar-Lin Minatee v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 11-3609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAR-LIN MINATEE
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLIFTON LYGHTS, LT. and others
Sharples v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv05124
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Sharples
Defendant:
Sup. Anderson, Cpt. Darcy, Sgt. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATER-McCOULLUM v. CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE et al
as 2:2009cv01353
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER-McCOULLUM
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE, FAULKE, P.J. VINCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James v. Godinez et al
as 1:2008cv05773
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen James
Defendant:
S. Godinez, Assistant Director Ramirez, Supt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
