Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
Mogaji v. Chan, et al
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTHA I.O. MOGAJI
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSA CHAN, TOM CHAN, NAN KING RESTAURANT and others
Robert Johnson v. Shirley Bennett
as 22-6843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT H. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY BENNETT, Assistant Superintendent, BARBARA HARGROVE, Unit Manager, N. REMACHE, Sargeant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gardner v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Gardner
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, I.O. Bland and I.O. Mayflower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mogaji v. Chan et al
as 1:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Martha I.O Mogaji
Defendant:
Nan King Restaurant, Tom Chan, TRC Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mogaji V. Chan et al
as 1:2019cv12585
Defendant:
Rosa Chan, Nan King Restaurant, Tom Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Marth l.O Mogaji and Martha I.O Mogaji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00496
Defendant:
W. Harber, W. Swiney, C. Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Flemmings et al
as 7:2019cv00174
Defendant:
I.O. Santos, Mr. Anderson, I.O. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
