Cases 1 - 10 of 26
The Water Works Board of the City of Opelika, Alabama v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12928
Plaintiff:
The Water Works Board of the City of Opelika, Alabama
Defendant:
3M Company, Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLC, Contitech USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Torts to Land
The Water Works Board of the City of Opelika, Alabama v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2025cv00411
Plaintiff:
The Water Works Board of the City of Opelika, Alabama
Defendant:
3M Company, Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLC, Contitech USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Interface, Inc. v. Lizama et al
as 1:2025cv00002
Plaintiff:
Interface, Inc.
Defendant:
Marie Lizama and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
