Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Doe v. Volokh
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Intervenor:
EUGENE VOLOKH
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LISBON, NH
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIANS AWARE and others
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re:
JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae:
TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor:
JURORS
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae:
Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr.
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae:
MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
UNITED STATES
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS and others
Amicus Curiae:
WTVD TELEVISION, LLC, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Mark Boal et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv05407
Movant:
ABC, Inc., AOL, Inc., American Society of News Editors and others
Defendant:
Robert B Abrams, Ashton B. Carter, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Boal and Flakjacket LLC
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner:
JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
United States of America v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 16-308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Appellee:
Hubert Dean Moore, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and HSBC Holdings PLC
Amicus Curiae:
Brandon L. Garrett, Better Markets, Inc., Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
