Cases 1 - 10 of 314
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peerless Indemnity Company et al v. Immanuel Baptist Church et al
as 3:2024cv00450
Defendant:
M. M. C., S. M. O., C. R. B. and others
Plaintiff:
Peerless Indemnity Company and Peerless Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00126
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Scholl et al v. Wellington Management, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
Madison Scholl and Immanuel Jones
Defendant:
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States v. Thomas
as 24-6074
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZQUAREUS TROYEZ IMMANUEL THOMAS, AKA Maniac
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Immanuel Manning
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Unit 29 (MSP) Staff (Time Periods), SMCI Staff (Time Periods) and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. TIMES INTERNET LIMITED
as 2:2024cv04350
Plaintiff:
IMMANUEL JOHNSON and ANIIRUDH RAMESH
Defendant:
TIMES INTERNET LIMITED and TIMES INTERNET INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(HC) Shotwell v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
Immanuel Shotwell
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
