Cases 31 - 40 of 4,296
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez v. Causey
as 24-60080
Plaintiff:
Gabino Ramos Hernandez
Defendant:
Phillip Causey, John Doe, An Unknown Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer and United States of America
Casilla Rosario v. Searls
as 24-379
Petitioner:
ROBERT CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shalon Grode v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 8:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shalon Grode
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
