Cases 51 - 60 of 9,749
Keeling et al v. John Crane Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
RONALD KEELING and Lois Keeling
Defendant:
John Crane Inc., 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wright et al v. Cummins Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10496
Plaintiff:
Bruce S Wright and Louise K Wright
Cross Claimant:
Cummins Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., IMO Industries Inc. and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Cooper-Bessemer Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
General Electric Company, ITT LLC, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Sahm et al v. Allegheny Technologies Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Janet Sahm, Peter Sahm and David Sahm
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest To TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC.,, AVCO CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to LYCOMING ENGINES, BAKER HUGHES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10327
Defendant:
Carrier Corporation, Fort Kent Holdings, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
HBW Industries, Inc., Riley Power Inc., The Marley-Wylain Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John S. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
HAMISH WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES and HAMISH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC., INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al.
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gallo et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Angela Bernhardine Gallo and Lisa Antionietta Lieselotte Gallo
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
