Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Reininger et al v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Michael Reininger, John Malinowski, Darrell Miner and others
Defendant:
Roland L. Butler, FBI, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cordelia Nwonwu v. Zachary Johnson
as 22-3606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cordelia O. Nwonwu
Defendant / Appellee:
Zachary Johnson
Defendant:
Instant Acres Incorporated, doing business as Instant Acres, Inc.
Cordelia Nwonwu v. Amanda Wheeler
as 22-3605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cordelia O. Nwonwu
Defendant / Appellee:
Amanda Wheeler
Defendant:
Instant Acres Incorporated, doing business as Instant Acres, Inc. and Zachary Johnson
Nwonwu v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv03060
Plaintiff:
Cordelia O. Nwonwu
Defendant:
Zachary Johnson and Instant Acres Incorporated doing business as Instant Acres Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
NWONWU v. JOHNSON
as 1:2021cv01596
Plaintiff:
CORDELIA O. NWONWU
Defendant:
ZACHARY JOHNSON and INSTANT ACRES INCORPORATED doing business as INSTANT ACRES INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azu v. Instant Checkmate et al
as 1:2019cv04182
Defendant:
Joey D. Rocco, Instant Checkmate and Kris C. Kibash
Plaintiff:
Onuoha Azu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
